Comments on: Using Google as a quick spell checker http://translocator.ws/2006/01/22/using-google-as-a-spell-checker ...transporting ideas... Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:08:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: Adam http://translocator.ws/2006/01/22/using-google-as-a-spell-checker/comment-page-1#comment-37104 Adam Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:28:07 +0000 http://translocator.ws/2006/01/22/using-google-as-a-spell-checker#comment-37104 "Besides, I would be very surprised if any of you even try this trick." Believe it or not, I have been using this for quite a while :D. This is in addition to FF's own spell checker, and I find this method a great time saver as well. “Besides, I would be very surprised if any of you even try this trick.”

Believe it or not, I have been using this for quite a while :D. This is in addition to FF’s own spell checker, and I find this method a great time saver as well.

]]> By: Jim http://translocator.ws/2006/01/22/using-google-as-a-spell-checker/comment-page-1#comment-108 Jim Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:34:52 +0000 http://translocator.ws/2006/01/22/using-google-as-a-spell-checker#comment-108 Good job, Matt! You are the first to notice. ;-) When I wrote this, I knew it should be thoroughly spell checked, but when saw I had misspelled three words (bandwi<strong>d</strong>th, scen<strong>a</strong>rio, and mis<strong>s</strong>pellings), I thought it would be fun to see if anyone would find them. :-D Thanks for the feedback. I have fixed them now. Good job, Matt! You are the first to notice. ;-)

When I wrote this, I knew it should be thoroughly spell checked, but when saw I had misspelled three words (bandwidth, scenario, and misspellings), I thought it would be fun to see if anyone would find them. :-D Thanks for the feedback. I have fixed them now.

]]> By: Matt http://translocator.ws/2006/01/22/using-google-as-a-spell-checker/comment-page-1#comment-107 Matt Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:09:46 +0000 http://translocator.ws/2006/01/22/using-google-as-a-spell-checker#comment-107 You should have used this method to check "scenerio." You should have used this method to check “scenerio.”

]]>